Custom Web Development
Built to a written specification rather than assembled from a theme. Lighter, faster, no plugin stack to maintain.
What it involves
Services
Six kinds of engagement, each with what the work involves and how it is estimated.
Everything here ships the same way: a repository in your organisation, matching environments, automated deployment, tested backups, monitoring and documentation. What changes between these six is the problem, not the standard.
Built to a written specification rather than assembled from a theme. Lighter, faster, no plugin stack to maintain.
What it involvesPortals, dashboards, booking and quoting tools. Software with users and permissions.
What it involvesCRM, ERP, payment, logistics and WhatsApp. The part where most projects overrun, tested first.
What it involvesOne content source feeding several destinations, when that is genuinely worth the extra moving part.
What it involvesMoving platform or host without losing data, rankings or the ability to trade during the move.
What it involvesPipelines, monitoring, tested backups, patching, and a named engineer who answers.
What it involvesFour situations, and the honest answer for each.
IF
Custom development. “Nearly” is where the maintenance cost hides, and it compounds every year.
IF
Application development. Once there are users, roles and a workflow, it is software and should be scoped as software.
IF
Integrations, and a spike before any estimate. This is the single most common cause of an overrun.
IF
Migration. Inventory first, redirect map second, and a rollback plan that has been tested.
Send the requirement, however roughly it is written. You get back the questions we would need answered, the integrations we would test first, and a realistic range.